Monday, February 14, 2011

I am really looking forward to a study- planning retreat next week in Montreal. I will be gone from February 23-25 to think about the creation and implementation of a holistic small group ministry at Durkeetown. I will also spend time in considering a very helpful article on changing paradigms in missions within the church.  I find these planning times to be useful in thinking about larger issues in my own personal life as well as the church.

Some other items to think over and pray about will be a meeting with Francois Turcotte (director of SEMBEQ) concerning Zach's plans to work in Quebece as a cross-cultural missionary. I am looking forward to teaching another Passion Week series in April. I have a burden to expand this teaching to include a morning and afternoon teaching segment in Glens Falls and Fort Edward village. The retreat will help me confirm whether or not God wants me to expand the teaching.

One thing for sure - when vacation comes after mission week, I will be soooo ready to take the break. I am hoping to catch a baseball game at the new park in Washington, D.C.

My Scripture reading has been very timely lately as I have been in Romans 6-8. No condemnation! Wow! What a gospel. What grace. Praise God who has reconciled us to Himself in Jesus and is reconciling all things to Himself through Jesus Christ.




Saturday, February 5, 2011

What to Do with the rest of the Winter

Ground Hog day passed by this week with a fairly significant winter storm. The storm allowed me the occasion to relax, reflect and remember. So let me take some blog space to relate what happened -

Relax - this is very hard for me to do. I am often reminded how hard it is for me to "do nothing" for even a brief period of time. My mind often will not stop thinking which leads me to either guilt for not being active or an anxious-anger because I am compelled to do something! Most of my relaxing comes in the form of either exercise or viewing T.V. I am still not sure whether the latter is healthy but I did mix the exercise and T.V. together so I came away feeling like it was mostly worth it. I am not sure I have ever truly relaxed in my life. Maybe I will, one day, grow up enough in faith and personal maturity to close my brain down and force myself to be still. I don't know how relaxing it will be though...

Reflect - in the space of one week I had three people die who were, in one form or another, part of my life. My first "girlfriend" (she probably wasn't aware she was my girlfriend at the time) died from cancer. My first secretary in Florida died from cancer as well. My friend here at Durkeetown, Jim Wood, also died from cancer. The three deaths caused me to reflect on how important it is to love and forgive. I am going to pray for God to help me repair all relationships that I sense are broken - even if they are only a stress-fracture. Kendra, my first girl-friend, and I were the same age. I was thinking about how I am not guaranteed another day - only the moment in front of me. Freddie, my secreatary, was in her 70's - it caused me to reflect on the reality that my parents and Rhonda's parents are aging and somehow we need to be more involved in their lives. Jim - well he was in his early sixities but the thing that I reflected on most is that the longer I stay in this place the more I am going to be saying goodbye to brothers and sisters in Christ.

Finally- I need to remember  the hope of resurrection. Just as winter is passing so life is passing. This should not lead me to despair but to hope. I am rapidly moving into the winter of my life. I have but a breath and it will be over so I need to remember to live each day to its fullest. To live out my rest of life mission so that I bring glory to God with the way I conduct my life.

So, what will I do with the rest of winter? I will do all that I can to make visible the kingdom of Jesus my Lord and Savior. Hope you will as well.



Sunday, January 23, 2011

Book Review - John Mac Arthur's "Slave"

The back cover begins..."Centuries ago, English translators perpetrated a fraud in the New Testament, and it's been covered up every since. Your own Bible is probably included in the cover up." 

Whenever someone suggests that the Bible lacks credibility I usually shrug it off as anti-christian bias. After all, this has been happening since the Satan said the Author of the Bible lacked credibility.  But when a strong proponent of biblical authority, a man who believes in a high view of the Scripture says that "translators have perpertrated a fraud"  - I sat up and took notice.

I was asked to review the book "Slave" by Dr. John Mac Arthur as part of a marketing campaign by Thomas Nelson publishers. I would receive the book for free if I would read it and post a review of the book on my blog. So here goes my first review.

Overall I believe the book is useful because Dr. Mac Arthur is a faithful expositor and his work in this book is faithful as well.

My frustration with the book falls under the category of what I would call the "tabloid news tease effect." This marketing technique is used in T.V., Talk Radio, Sports Talk Radio and most advertising. It teases the viewer/reader/listener to "stay tuned" by suggesting that what is coming is so incredible that you wouldn't want to miss it.

While I put up with this in pagan marketing I was quite surprised that it would be part of evangelical circles. I believe Paul (that would be the Apostle Paul) wrote something about not 'tampering with the Word of God" for personal gain.

If the kind of "cover up" that Dr. Mac Arthur says has happened, has in fact happened. And if it has had the level of negative impact on our discipleship that he would suggest, then a massive recall of the bible needs to take place immediately. We are talking about the Word of the most high God.  If companies recall toys, medicine and automobiles for safety reasons it would only seem reasonable that someone with more influence than this reviewer would get right on this and demand a recall. I assume the bean counters at the bible publishing companies would not be in favor of bearing the cost of republishing millions of bibles even if it meant getting the biblical text accurate.

Another difficulty was that Dr. Mac Arthur gives a rather negative assessment of the "contemporary evangelical movement" (pg. 74). I find this judgment more than a bit hypocritical given the way this book is being marketed. To take a slap at those whom he had in mind over their so-called "worldly methods" and "worldly music" and having no "lordship ideology" is ridiculous, especially in light of how this book is presented as that which "unveils the essential and clarifying revelation that my be keeping [me] from a fulfilling and correct relationship with God." Really??? Hmmm. It is tough to take a lecture on the compromise of  "market driven strategies in ministry" (pg. 75) from someone who tells me that his book holds the key to a correct relationship with God and that a cover up of "biblical proportions" has kept me from that relationship.

I have no doubt that Dr. Mac Arthur is correct that the word for "slave" was mistranslated and probably for cultural reasons. As a pastor I am constantly aware of the illustrations I use and the responsibility to be culturally relevant. I am grateful for men like John Mac Arthur who have bequeathed this great heritage of biblical fidelity to me and millions of others through his writing, preaching and radio ministry.

So how do we move forward in regaining the concept of "slave" as a defining reality of our discipleship in Jesus?

This is perhaps where the book was most confusing. He never really tells us how to move forward. It seems that the author's intention was to write a book about Calvinistic doctrine. My natural bent to cynicism would lead me to believe that in order to get someone to read a book on Calvinistic theology you had better have a good lure - like the one on pg. 1 when the author tells us that he realized there had been a "centuries-long cover up by English New Testament translators that had obscured a precious, powerful, and clarifying revelation by the Holy Spirit."  Now I am not much of a fisherman, but I think that is a lure.

Since I am a commitment to biblical fidelity in matters of the glorious gospel of grace, I don't mind reading a book that reinforces my need to keep living in vital dependence to that grace. The problem is that the book has no gospel well to drink from. It is a well written lecture on doctrine but not a place for grace. It would be like giving a thirsty man a lecture on the elements of water without providing for him an actual drink of water.

If I am going to appropriate the spiritual reality of being a slave what I will need is for the gospel to change me so that I embody the teaching of being a slave as well as the reality of living as a slave to Jesus. I sensed in this book the usual law-lecture instead of pointing me to see the One who as rich and yet for my sake became poor so that through His poverty I might become rich.

My desire is to have my discipleship convey the full surrender of being a slave to Jesus. I pray for grace to embody it in the way Jesus did. To the extent that John Mac Arthur's book "Slave" encourages this I am grateful. To the extent he used the alleged "cover up" to sell books and take a swipe at culturally relevant expressions of being a slave of Christ I am disappointed.

Sunday, January 2, 2011

Movement

This blog entry will cover the sermon from January 2, 2011. I have included the essay by Tim Keller on "Movement." At the end of the essay you will see three questions I have added. If you interact about this essay please include your thought concerning at least one of the questions I have posed.  ~ PKP.

Ministry Movements – Tim Keller
The word "movement" is often used to describe a kind of vital, dynamic human organization, in order to distinguish it from what are called "institutions." Both of these words can have broader meanings, but for the sake of this discussion let us define them in the following ways.
A movement is marked by an attractive, clear, unifying vision for the future together with a strong set of values or beliefs. The content of the vision must be compelling and clear so that others can grasp it readily. It must not be so esoteric or difficult that only a handful of people can articulate it. Instead, it must be something that all members of the movement can understand and pass along to others. By contrast, "institutionalized" organizations are held together by rules, regulations, and procedures, not by a shared vision.

This unifying vision is so compelling that it takes pride of place. First, the vision leads to sacrificial commitment. Individuals put the vision ahead of their own interests and comfort. They are willing to work without high compensation, power, or perks. The satisfaction of realized goals is their main compensation. There is no more practical index of whether you have a movement or not. If the leader is making all the sacrifices, you don't.

Second, the vision leads to generous flexibility. Institutionalized organizations are very turf conscious. Members are suspicious of anyone encroaching on their area of responsibility. Positions and power have been hard-won and jealously guarded. This is done by slavish devotion to rules of procedure, accreditation, and tenure.  In movements, however, the accomplishment of the vision is more important than power and position. So people are willing to make allies, be flexible, and cooperate with anyone sharing the basic vision and values.
Third, the vision leads to innovativeness. Institutions are organized more vertically, where ideas from "below" are unwelcome. Movements are flatter because the commonly shared vision unifies and empowers. The vision is what matters - so anyone with a good idea about how to accomplish it is welcome to give it. Ideas flow out of the whole organization, top to bottom, which leads to greater creativity.

Finally, a movement is marked by spontaneous generativity. Spontaneous combustion means energy generated from within - a conflagration without the need for external ignition. A movement is able to generate its own resources, recruit its own new members and participants, and (especially) raise up its own new leaders. This does not mean that movements have no formal training programs. Rather, it means that first, the vision of the movement (especially as its content is disseminated) attracts people with leadership potential, and, secondly, that the work of the movement provides opportunities that reveal emerging leaders through real-life experience and then prepares them for the next level of leadership in the movement. Denominations or church networks that always have to recruit ministers and staff that were raised up in other environments, and that attract them mainly with good compensation, do not show signs of being a movement.

David Hurst, a Harvard scholar, summed up how movements become institutions this way - vision becomes strategy, roles become tasks, teams become structure, networks become organizations, recognition becomes compensation. It is wrong, however, to draw such a hard line between the two forms. It is typical in the Christian movement literature to be highly critical of "institutionalism," for good reason. But the impression is left that all authority, central control, and formal processes are bad for ministry. The reality is more complex.
It is natural for new churches and ministries to try very hard to stay informal, non-codified, and non-centralized. But part of what makes a movement dynamic is a unified vision, and that always requires some codification and control. As time goes on, to maintain the main engine of movement-dynamics - a unified vision - a ministry must adopt some of the aspects of institutions. A strong movement, then, occupies the difficult space between being a free-wheeling organism and a disciplined organization.  A movement that refuses to take on some organizational characteristics - authority, tradition, unity of belief, and quality control - will fragment and dissipate. A movement that does not also resist the inevitable tendency toward complete institutionalization will lose its vitality and effectiveness as well. The job of the movement leader is to steer the ship safely between these two opposite perils.

Application Questions from Keller Essay and Sermon on Gospel Movement by P. Ken (please note that the questions were added by P. Ken Prater)

  1. “A movement is marked by an attractive, clear, unifying vision for the future together with a strong set of values or beliefs” (second paragraph, pg. 1). Allow me to suggest two applications:

·        In Romans 8:28-30 the Apostle Paul gives us the “attractive, clear, unifying vision” of Jesus for His church. This vision is going to be completed by God in such a way that He is worshiped forever by those who come to “glorification” through the power of God who works all things together for good.

·        Acts 2:42-47 illustrates how the church presently experiences a measure of the “glorification” that Paul writes about. We know that God must empower us to do this work but we also know that He expects us to do the work. In light of this consider these questions:

-         If by “a strong set of values or beliefs” Keller means convictions or principles to live by – what are ours? If movement is going to take place it must be marked by something. Can you articulate your gospel convictions? What would you say are the “gospel convictions” of Durkeetown?


  1. “The vision leads to sacrificial commitment” (third paragraph); “to generous flexibility” (fourth paragraph); “to innovativeness” (fifth paragraph).

·        Re-read the third, fourth and fifth paragraphs and answer the following questions:

-         Which is the most difficult for you personally to live with? What will require the most change from you so that vision can move?

-         Where is Durkeetown (as a collective Body) most vulnerable? If we don’t make a course correction how will it impact the ability of vision to move?  

-         Where do you see “sacrificial commitment, generous flexibility and innovativeness” in the narrative from Acts 2:42-47 and 4:23-37?

  1. P. Ken mentioned the movement of the gospel in the global, local and individual context. How can Durkeetown be more effective in being part of the global, local and individual movement of the gospel? Write down and share some practical ways to do this so we can benefit from your thoughts.

      

Thursday, December 30, 2010

Gospel Movement Part Two

Movement - the word indicates action, change, improvement, exertion of power.

When movement is associate with the gospel we can assume that the action, change, improvement will come because God has exerted His power through the means He has ordained.

The Acts of the Apostles is a powerful example of how God used the "means" He ordained (His Spirit-energized people praying, preaching, suffering, obeying, loving, sacrificing) to accomplish the movement He purposed. God had previously promised that the nations would worship Him and that Jesus would be the center-piece of that worship. This global purpose is being accomplished and Acts tells the story. 

One of the most exciting and satisfying aspects of the Christian experience is to participate in  the ongoing movement of the gospel through using the spiritual gifts God has blessed us  with.  We should never separate ourselves from the reality that God is still completing His work through the means He ordained - His Spirit-energized people praying, preaching, suffering, obeying, loving and sacrificing. The names may have changed from Barnabas and Paul but the movement is still pressing the good news out into the culture.

I would encourage your prayers for our little community at Durkeetown to be in the path of blessing as we keep looking for ways to be part of gospel movement. Pray specifically that people put into practice the information they have been given about their spiritual gifts so that they participate fully in the mission of the gospel. Pray also that we love each other, forgive one another and encourage the community of God's people.

The gospel is still moving, I look forward to experiencing that movement in the coming year!


 

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

The Way of Jesus

I couldn't help but think that when I started this blog it was during a time when I had a bit of hope that my baseball team would perhaps compete this year. Now that it is October and my baseball season ended long before most fans end theirs I probably should be writing about suffering - which is the theme for this Sunday.

As you know we have been examining "Gospel Movement." Jesus is on the move and amazingly the movement is continuing. We should be people filled with thanksgiving and praise because this movement of Jesus has made its way to us. Spiritual darkness is vanquished and the Light of the glorious gospel is available to all  who will believe.

As the Apostles preach this message  they are initially well spoken of (that should sound familiar because the same was true of Jesus in Lk. 4). But once the religious establishment gets wind of the movement, they step in and start to bring pressure. The pressure ends up in threats and accusations because they recognize these uneducated men as "having been with Jesus." By the way, no more impressive accusation could be launched against a Christ-follower than for someone to have accused them of being with Jesus. 

The response of the church in Acts 4 is what we should hope for as we suffer for the cause of the gospel:
  *  the church prays and rejoices
  *  the Spirit ignites them again with power
  *  the word of God goes out with authority

As we will learn this Sunday - suffering is not just physical. It is much deeper and more pervasive in our culture than at first glance. But the question we struggle with is this: "How do we respond to suffering?"  Will the suffering we encounter lead us to greater power or cause us to shrink back?

I would encourage you to read Acts 3-4 and familiarize yourself with the story so you too can rejoice to see a mighty and powerful God at work in gospel movement.

Thursday, October 21, 2010

The Gospel and the North County

After a long absence from writing my wife reminded me of how important it is to keep commitments - so I will try to improve on consistency and content.

In case you haven't noticed I have been trying to establish this line of thought in the Sunday A.M. sermons - "Jesus is on the Move."  This movement is best seen in the book Acts as Luke records the actions of the Holy Spirit in the lives of the appointed servants.

This Sunday we are going to examine the action of the Spirit through the means of preaching the gospel. The question simply stated is this: Is the gospel still able to break through the spiritual darkness of our age? We know that the Apostles took as their primary mission the speaking of that gospel (Jesus died, Jesus rose - repent and believe Him as Lord).  We also know that through the witness of these apostles that the greco-roman culture was broken open and changed. The change was so dramatic that is caused pagan population rioted as the apostles brought the gospel to bear on the culture.  Systemic change - not superficial change - resulted and hope came like a warm breeze in Spring. There is no way for us to truly measure the impact of the gospel on the first century culture except to say that history records for us that the transformation was experienced on every level of society. 

So where does that leave us in the present age? Is the spiritual darkness deeper and stronger today than it was 2000 years ago? Is the gospel spoken to non-Christ followers still the means through which the powers of darkness will be crushed? The great challenge we face is not if the gospel is powerful enough but whether we believe the gospel is powerful enough.

The north country is as dark of a place as the pagan culture in Ephesus, Colosse or Philippi. We have major crime, family breakdown, addictions, materialism, greed, sexual sins, etc, etc, etc.  We also have the most powerful weapon to break through the darkness - the Spirit of power working through the people of Jesus as they declare the saving actions of almighty God.

I encourage you to pray for me as I preach this Sunday that I would communicate God's grace to people attending who may not even be Christians. So the Spirit is needed in our church to break through darkness. Pray also that we as a Church will believe that the gospel is enough and that as we give obedience to living it the Spirit will bring about transformation in our area just as He did 2000 years ago.